โ† Knowledge base
๐ŸŽพ

Rebound relationships

The research disagrees with the received wisdom โ€” rebounds do better than their reputation, and the reason is not what people assume.

Relationship science

A rebound relationship is one started soon after a significant relationship ended, before the person is assumed to have processed it. The received wisdom is that rebounds are doomed, unfair to the new partner, and a way of avoiding grief.

The research is not on the side of the received wisdom.

What the studies find

Claudia Brumbaugh and Chris Fraley's work is the most direct test, following people through breakups and into new relationships. People who started new relationships sooner reported higher self-esteem, more confidence in their desirability, and less lingering attachment to the ex than people who waited. Their new relationships were not less satisfying, and they were not shorter.

Spielmann and colleagues found something more specific. For anxiously attached people in particular, focusing on someone new was one of the more effective ways to let go of an ex โ€” the new attachment did the work that time alone was not doing.

Sbarra and Emery's work on the emotional course of breakups fills in why. Recovery is not a fixed quantity of grief that must be paid before anything else can start. It is largely a question of re-establishing a sense of self and of being wanted, and a new relationship is one of several things that can supply both.

None of this says rebounds are optimal. It says the confident version โ€” that they are inherently unhealthy and unfair โ€” does not survive contact with the data.

Where the real risk is

Not the timing. Three things that actually predict trouble, none of which is about how many weeks have passed:

Using the person rather than being with them. A relationship whose function is to prove something to an ex, or to avoid an empty flat, will show it โ€” usually as a partner who cannot tell whether they are being seen. The test is not how soon you started; it is whether you could describe what you like about this specific person without reference to the last one.

Comparison as a running commentary. Some comparison is unavoidable. A relationship where the new person is continuously being scored against the previous one is a different thing, and it is legible from outside sooner than the person doing it realises.

Concealment. Not disclosing a recent significant breakup, when it is still shaping how you behave, deprives the other person of information they need. This is the one genuine ethical issue in the vicinity, and it has nothing to do with timing either.

If you are the rebound

The position is uncomfortable and not automatically bad. What matters is whether the relationship is being built on you or around a gap.

Questions worth asking directly rather than watching for signs: how recent, how significant, and is there contact still. Then watch for something simpler than any of that โ€” whether they are curious about you specifically. Someone in a genuine rebound is often warm, attentive, and asking almost nothing, because the relationship's job is to be occupied rather than to know anyone.

And a caution in the other direction: rebound is used as an accusation more often than it is used accurately. A relationship that started three months after a breakup and is going well is not required to be a rebound because the calendar says so. Some of them are simply the next relationship.

sources

  • ยท Brumbaugh, C. C., Fraley, R. C. (2015). Too fast, too soon? An empirical investigation into rebound relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.
  • ยท Spielmann, S. S., MacDonald, G., Wilson, A. E. (2009). On the rebound: focusing on someone new helps anxiously attached individuals let go of ex-partners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
  • ยท Sbarra, D. A., Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution. Personal Relationships.

More from the knowledge base