Communication Style Test —
無料・全20問
Twenty situations, four ways to handle each — and the two dials underneath: whether you tell or ask, and whether you show or hold.
🔁 いつでも切り替えOK — 回答は引き継がれます·同じ質問、同じ採点、同じく無料の結果
背景にある科学
The social-styles model, in use since the 1960s in one form or another, describes communication along two axes that are independent of each other: assertiveness (whether you tend to tell people things or ask them) and expressiveness (whether feeling shows in how you communicate or stays out of it). The two together give four styles, and the model's practical claim is that most friction between people is a style mismatch rather than a substance disagreement. These twenty situations are written for MoodyWonder; each card is one corner of the grid, and the result reads both axes as percentiles before naming the style. 測定方法をくわしく読む →
無料で受けとれるもの
- ✓Your two axes — assertiveness and expressiveness — against other people's
- ✓The style they combine into, and how firmly you sit in it
- ✓The style you clash with most, and why the clash is about form rather than substance
アタッチメント・スタイルのサンプルです — レイアウトはどの診断も同じ。
結果に有料部分はありません。無料プロフィールを作ればレポートは全部開き、ずっと保存されます。それが私たちの約束です。
よくある質問
Which style is best?
None. Each has a room it works in and a room it fails in: the direct style closes decisions and bruises people; the warm style keeps teams together and delays hard calls. The model's point is that friction between two people is usually a style clash, and naming it is what dissolves it.
Does this change depending on who I'm talking to?
It flexes, and the situations here are chosen to catch the default rather than the flex. If you score near the middle on an axis, that is real information: you adjust more than most, and the cost of adjusting is worth knowing too.
How is this different from DISC?
Related models, different emphasis. DISC reads behaviour in a team; this reads the communication itself — the two dials that decide how a sentence comes out of you. If you have both results, they will usually agree on the corner and disagree on the details.
あわせて受けたい診断
ひとつ加えるごとに、Lunaの助言はより的確になります。